Joop! Homme Eau De Toilette

Joop! Homme Eau De Toilette

Joop!
Year: 1989
Perfumer: Michel Almairac
69.5 /100
(4 reviews)

Vibe Composition

Synthetic
Vanilla
Sweet
Floral
Spicy
Resinous
Creamy
Metallic

Notes

Top Notes

Orange blossomMandarin orangeBergamotLemon

Middle Notes

HeliotropeCinnamonLily of the valleyJasmine

Base Notes

Tonka beanVanillaSandalwoodPatchouli

Community Votes

Gender:
Male
Value:
Smart Buy
Seasons:
🌸 Spring (33%)🍂 Fall (33%)❄️ Winter (33%)
Occasions:
🍸 Bar & Dinner (33%)🕯️ Date (22%)🪩 Party (22%)

Showcase on profile as:

Lovers of Joop! Homme Eau De Toilette also love

Similar Vibes

Reviews & Hot Takes (4)

RR
Rokin RandyVisionary
95 /100
2 SPRAYS (8h)
Sweet (79%) Aromatic (77%) Resinous (68%) Floral (39%) Tobacco (34%)
🕯️ Date🪩 Party🍸 Bar & Dinner
❄️ winter🍂 fall🌸 spring
male
Undervalued Gem

Most Joop! Homme reviews are just people trying to outdo each other with jokes . How bad they hate it blah blah blah. And Exaggerations about how strong it is. Yeah… that’s the point. Go light on the sprays you’ll get compliments and not kill people. No more than 2 sprays. Next. Joop! Homme feels like a throwback to a lost art in perfumery. Back when fragrance was meant to announce your presence — not just impress somebody for 30 seconds at a counter. And get them hooked on something you’ll use up in a months time so you’ll be back to buy more. Perfumers learned a long time ago that most buyers judge a fragrance by the opening, so a lot of modern scents are engineered to hook people immediately instead of truly performing. This does the opposite. This is not the kind of scent you bury your face into and instantly go, “Wow, buy that.” This is for people who understand performance, projection, and presence. One or two sprays is plenty. Go past that and you might gas the entire room. Strong. Loud. Long-lasting. It reminds me of what perfume was originally meant to do historically. Announce one’s presence (Royalty for example ) It lasts and you don’t run out quickly and keep your money.

AP
35 /100
3 SPRAYS (8h)
Synthetic (100%) Metallic (81%) Spicy (43%) Nutty (33%) Resinous (22%) Leathery (14%)
👕 Daily🍸 Bar & Dinner
☀️ summer🌸 spring
male
Fair Value

Joop! Homme – A Hard No From Me. Absolutely hate it. This fragrance gives me a headache every single when i brother wears it. It’s extremely sweet, spicy, and loud — with massive longevity, but not in a good way. To my nose, it smells like Coca-Cola mixed with cinnamon and a weird synthetic, plastic-like undertone. There’s a harsh chemical vibe that feels cheap and overpowering. I know many men love this and buy it confidently — but for me, it’s a big no. Strong projection, long lasting… but unfortunately, unbearable.🤧

AR
Andrew RVisionary
56 /100
3 SPRAYS (8h)
Synthetic (100%) Vanilla (100%) Sweet (100%) Floral (90%) Creamy (85%) Citrus (75%)
🍸 Bar & Dinner
🍂 fall❄️ winter
male
Overpriced

I absolutely hate this violently sweet, hideously synthetic assault on the senses. Personal: 1.5/10 – I hate this. It’s cloying, screechy, syrupy, and genuinely unpleasant to smell. There’s nothing here that works for me. Only reason it's not a 1 is because it is, subjectively, better than Rose & Cuir by Fredrick Malle. Mass appeal: 4/10 – Some people love it, and I truly do not understand how. Most modern noses will find this repulsive, except for *maybe* around 10 hours after application/ Performance: 8.5/10 – Unfortunately nuclear. It lasts forever and projects like it’s angry at you for existing. Value: 6/10 – It’s cheap and powerful, but value doesn’t matter if you don’t want it anywhere near you. Uniqueness: 8/10 – Horribly unique. You will never confuse this with anything else, and that is *NOT* a compliment. SCORE: 56/100 Full bottle buy? NO, absolutely not. Blind buy? NO, this is one of the worst blind buys imaginable. Recommend? NO, unless you are actively trying to punish someone, or yourself. Date night? NO, unless the goal is to ensure there is no second date. Office safe? NO, this should be illegal indoors. Pros: Massive performance, instantly recognizable, historically infamous, and I struggle to name those 3. Cons: Overwhelming sweetness, extremely synthetic, dated in the worst way, nauseating, zero subtlety, overpriced at $30, stains clothes, stains memories, smells like 1989 threw up in a beat up old Yugo... I'll stop there but I don't wanna. Joop! Homme smells like someone spilled cough syrup, grape candy, cheap vanilla, and hot floral soap onto a polyester jacket and then microwaved it. It is aggressively sweet, intensely synthetic, and completely out of step with anything I want to smell like. There is no evolution here, it just exists, loudly, for hours, refusing to go anywhere except up your nose, straight into your brain and sinuses, where it will ruminate before ultimately deciding it hates you, and wishes to inflict one of the most head-splitting headaches you've ever had. This is not bold in a charming way. It’s not retro in a cool way. It’s just excessive. Every note is turned up past reasonable limits, and the result is something that feels abrasive rather than confident. I understand that it was popular in its time, but that does not make it good now, nor does it make it interesting to revisit, and frankly, it wasn't even good then. Versace reinvented this specific wheel about 23 years later when they decided to release Eros, and that was actually palatable. This is so violently strong that it won't even work as a room spray, let alone a cologne. There are fragrances that are loud but fun. There are fragrances that are dated but charming. Joop! Homme is neither. It’s a relic that should probably, scratch that, should be legally required to stay in the past, remembered only as a cautionary tale of what happens when restraint leaves the building entirely. Edit to add: After reading reviews below this one, I do legitimately understand much of the fondness for this fragrance comes from nostalgia. But let's be honest, that's it. This is not objectively a good fragrance, and subjectively, it's disgusting. I really do understand why others like it, but I do not have any of that association, personally, thus inspiring my rant.

3